Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?


Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?

Puff Bar is a wonderful alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have already been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into the mouth area, therefore you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.

Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The Eightvape Coupon problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.

Plus the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available to buy could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.

It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.